Fed-Up Homeowners Who Can Pay the Mortgage, Don’t

The strategic defaults are getting more news today and this will thus feed more strategic defaults. This is such a touchy issue. On one side, how can one not defend someone from doing a Strategic Default. Ohhh, hold back the punches. The reality is that anyone buying property from 2006 to 2007 entered into an agreement based on what they thought were facts. Home values are this due to supply and demand. We have a professional appraiser verifing the value and thus this is a wise decision.

What they didn’t know was that for years banks were selling buyers 5 to 10 homes when those buyers had no possible way of making the payment without a tenant. They didn’t know that as homeowners tried to buy homes, they were competing with these “faux investors” who ran prices up like never before. We saw 5% appreciation month after month for 6 months in 2005. We were led to believe it was the market catching up with surpressed values and had no idea the “faux investors” were sitting on 10’s of thousands of vacant new homes and had already begun to defult.

To me, this was the biggest issue. In hind sight, we now know the banks were fully aware of the issues and kept that to themselves away from the public. So, here come buyers in 2007. Inventories here in the valley had dropped from a high of 40,000 in fall of 2006 to 34,000 in the beginning of 2007. This is a sign of a good market. Sales were picking up in their regular cyclical manner. There was a 4-6 month supply of homes. It looked as though the buyer was making a wise decision. Oh but wait, the guys lending the money fail to tell buyers many of their loans are bad and defaults are rising. Buyers acted in good will and the banks defrauded them, in my opinion. They get a government bailout, write down their losses and get huge bonusses. The buyer/borrower is upside down by $200,000, paying on a mortgage that will take 10+ years to get back to an equity position and making much less money through this recession. How can we ask why people are doing Strategic Defaults. A bank would walk in a minute, no questions.

Fed-Up Homeowners Who Can Pay the Mortgage, Don’t

By Alana Semuels

RISMEDIA, March 31, 2010—(MCT)—Wynn Bloch has always dutifully paid her bills and socked away money for retirement. But in December she defaulted on the mortgage on her Palm Desert, Calif., home, even though she could afford the payments.

Bloch paid $385,000 for the two-bedroom home in 2006 when prices were still surging. Comparable homes are now selling in the low $200,000s. Bloch, a retired psychologist doubted she’d see her investment rebound in her lifetime. Plus, she said, she was duped into an expensive loan.

The way she sees it, big banks that helped fuel the mess all got bailouts while homeowners like her are left holding the bag. No more. “There was not a chance that house was ever going to be worth anywhere near what my mortgage was,” said Bloch, who is now renting a few miles away after defaulting on the $310,000 loan. “I haven’t cheated or stolen.”

Time was when Americans would do almost anything to hang on to their homes. But that commitment appears to be fraying as more people fall behind on their loans, while watching the banks and lenders that helped trigger the financial crisis return to prosperity.

Nearly one-quarter of U.S. mortgages, or about 11 million home loans, are underwater, with buyers’ houses worth less than their loans. While home values are regaining ground, they remain far below their 2007 peak. Many homeowners are just now coming to grips with the idea that prices will take years to reach the pre-crash peak: as long as 14 years in California, according to economist Chris Thornberg.

Stuck with properties whose negative equity won’t recover for years—feeling betrayed by financial institutions that bankrolled the frenzy—some homeowners are concluding it’s smarter to walk away than to stick it out.

“There is a growing sense of anger, a growing recognition that there is a double standard if it’s OK for financial institutions to look after themselves, but not OK for homeowners,” said Brent T. White, a law professor at the University of Arizona who wrote a paper on the subject.

Just how many are walking away isn’t clear. But some researchers are convinced that the numbers are growing. So-called “strategic defaults” accounted for about 35% of defaults by U.S. homeowners in December 2009, up from 23% in March of 2009, according to Luigi Zingales, a professor at the University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business. He and colleagues at Northwestern University’s Kellogg School of Management reached that conclusion by surveying homeowners about their attitudes and experience with loan defaults. They found that borrowers were more willing to walk away if someone they knew had done it, and that the greater a homeowner’s negative equity the more likely they were to default, even if they had could make the monthly payment.

Similarly, an analysis released last year by credit bureau Experian and consulting firm Oliver Wyman estimated that walkaways accounted for nearly one in five homeowners who were seriously delinquent on their mortgages in the last three months of 2008.

“The fact that people are strategically defaulting—there is no question,” Zingales said. “The risk that the number of people doing this might explode is significant.”

A flood of walkaways could damage the nation’s fledgling housing recovery by swamping the market with foreclosed properties. Still, some experts are dubious that millions of underwater homeowners will pull the plug like Bloch did. Home ownership remains the cornerstone of the American dream. Moving is a hassle and the stigma associated with a foreclosure is likely to keep many hanging on for a recovery.

The biggest surprise is that so many underwater homeowners continue to pay, according to White, the Arizona law professor. He’s convinced that personal shame, as well as moral suasion by the government and financial institutions has kept many homeowners from walking away, even when they’d be better off financially to dump their homes.

But real estate veterans said old taboos are eroding fast. Jon Maddux, a former real estate investor who founded You Walk Away, a for-profit company that guides homeowners through the process of default in 2007, said his earliest customers struggled with emotional ties to their homes as well as remorse about reneging on an obligation. That’s changed as more homeowners have concluded that the housing market isn’t going to rebound quickly and they’d be better off cutting their losses. “Now, it’s more of a business decision—it’s people who could afford their house, but it’s an inconvenience,” Maddux said. He and other experts said average Americans are fed up with hearing how they’re supposed to honor their debts while businesses operate by another set of rules.

Consumers typically begin to think about walking away once the value of the property is 25% lower than the value of the debt, according to research conducted by Sam Khater, senior economist at real estate research firm First American CoreLogic. About five million people nationwide are in that situation, he said.

Some purchased their homes at the peak of the market only to see the value drop precipitously when the bubble burst. Others bought low, but couldn’t resist borrowing against their rising equity to make home improvements and to pay off other bills. When home values fell, they too found themselves underwater.

Ken Henrich purchased his Marysville, Calif., home for $187,000 in 2004. He and his wife later refinanced the property, tapping the equity to pay off credit cards. They now owe around $300,000 on a place that’s worth about $132,000. They let the four-bedroom residence slip into foreclosure and are currently waiting for it to be sold at auction. They’re planning on renting for a few years until they can possibly buy again. “We can more than make the payment,” Henrich said. “The way we look at it, our credit would still be perfect years from now, but we’d still owe tons more than it’s worth.”

There are consequences to walking away. A default will knock down a credit score by at least 100 points, said Craig Watts, a spokesman for FICO, the company that developed credit scores. That could make it tough to borrow money, rent an apartment or get a job since many employers now routinely check credit histories of potential hires.

To some, it’s a small price to pay to gain a measure of revenge against the financial institutions whose loose money helped to fuel the crisis. Joseph Shull, a marketing professor, said he’s planning on walking away from the town house he bought in Moorpark, Calif., in June 2006. “I’m angry, and there are a lot of people like me who are angry,” he said. He purchased the home for $410,000 and spent $30,000 renovating. Now the house is worth around $225,000. Shull admits he overpaid for his property, but he said it fell in value in part because of “regulatory mismanagement.”